Aman Mishra
New Delhi, Delhi, India
2K followers
500+ connections
View mutual connections with Aman
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
or
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
View mutual connections with Aman
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
or
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
View Aman’s full profile
Other similar profiles
-
Jaga Deep
CoimbatoreConnect -
Rahul.eth Ξ
NFT Collector & Investor / Yuga Maxi
Connect -
Ramanatha Shet
Domain Consultant
BengaluruConnect -
Rohit Chhabra
Domain consultant
Kanata, ONConnect -
Vimal Mohanraj
Management Consultant at Accenture
BengaluruConnect -
Akil Hasan
Airline Domain Manager @TCS with Specialization on eCommerce and PSS Migration Certified Scrum Master
Delhi, IndiaConnect -
Rashmi Admane
Oracle Analytics Cloud/Server Consultant || Oracle Utilities Analytics || Analytics/BI Publisher || Oracle Data Integrator || CCB || MDM || OMS || WAC Utilities
PuneConnect -
Santhosh Melekalathil
IBM Expert Labs, Kochi
KochiConnect -
Sivaramakrishna Nuthi
Head - BFSI Domain Competency Group at Cigniti Technologies
Andhra Pradesh, IndiaConnect -
Rohit Ganguli
Domain Consultant at Wipro
MumbaiConnect -
Arunkumar Sukumar
Account Manager & Domain Consultant @ Solverminds
Tamil Nadu, IndiaConnect -
Ganesh Bhor
Domain Consultant at Tata Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd.
KortrijkConnect -
Shireen Shaik
Senior Data Management Analyst at Wells Fargo
HyderabadConnect -
namexplore domains
domain name consultant at namexplore.
Delhi, IndiaConnect -
Dipangshu Roy
SAP Risk and Authorization Consultant at Tata Consultancy Services
KolkataConnect -
Rangachakkaravarthy Gopal
AS/400 & Misys Equation Specialist | Expertise in Core Banking Solutions, API Development, and System Upgrades | Innovator in Banking Technology Solutions
MuscatConnect -
Nishant Raj
GurugramConnect -
Ramachandra Murty Parupudi
Principal Consultant (Domain & Process) at Infosys Limited
HyderabadConnect -
Vishnu Naga Praveen D
Plano, TXConnect
Explore more posts
-
RAW LAW
Delhi High Court Dismisses Review Petition Challenging ₹50,000 Costs in Commercial Litigation: Holds That Costs Are Nominal and Cannot Be Waived Through Review Court’s Decision The Delhi High Court declined to vary or waive the costs of ₹50,000/- imposed earlier, emphasizing that the costs were reasonable, particularly in the context of commercial litigation. The court also noted that the Supreme Court had dismissed the petitioner’s Special Leave Petition (SLP) challenging the same costs, finding no reason to interfere with the High Court’s original order. The court, however, extended the time for payment of costs by eight weeks from the date of this order. Facts Background of the Transfer Petitions: The petitioner filed two transfer petitions (TR.P.(C.) 75/2024 and TR.P.(C.) 76/2024) seeking the transfer of cases. These petitions were dismissed by the Delhi High Court, with costs of ₹50,000/- imposed on the petitioner. Supreme Court Involvement: Dissatisfied with the dismissal, the petitioner approached the Supreme Court via an SLP. The Supreme Court dismissed the SLP, explicitly stating that there was no cause to interfere with the High Court’s order, including the imposition of costs. Filing of Review Petitions: The petitioner subsequently filed review petitions before the Delhi High Court seeking a waiver of the costs. Issues Whether the costs of ₹50,000/- imposed by the High Court in the original order could be waived through a review petition. Whether additional time for payment of costs could be granted to the petitioner. Court’s Reasoning Reasonableness of Costs: The court stated that the costs of ₹50,000/- were nominal, particularly given the commercial nature of the disputes. It noted that commercial litigation often involves significant financial stakes, making the imposition of such costs a minimal burden. Lack of Grounds for Review: The court highlighted that the petitioner failed to provide any substantive reason for waiving the costs. The Supreme Court’s explicit refusal to interfere with the High Court’s order reinforced the legitimacy of the costs imposed. Extension of Time: Acknowledging the practicalities of compliance, the court granted the petitioner an additional eight weeks to pay the costs. Conclusion The High Court dismissed the review petitions, holding that there was no basis to waive or reduce the costs imposed. However, it allowed the petitioner an extension of eight weeks to pay the costs. #DelhiHighCourt #JudicialDecisions #CommercialLitigation #LegalCosts #ReviewPetitions #LegalUpdates #IndianJudiciary #CourtOrders #ReasonableCosts #LitigationInsights
-
LawStreet Journal
ED to seek court nod for custody of accused, if not arrested till cognisance of complaint: SC [Read Judgment] . . Follow Lawstreet Journal for more legal updates #SupremeCourtRuling #EnforcementDirectorate #LegalCustody #CourtApproval #JudicialCognizance #LegalProcedure #India #LawstreetJ . . Click to read full article 👇 https://rb.gy/j2yhu0
1
-
The Legal Affair
Legal clarity! ⚖️ the Jharkhand High Court reaffirms that civil judges (senior division) can adjudicate suits below Rs. 5 lakh, even if valuation aligns with Munsif courts' jurisdiction. Objections to undervaluation must be timely raised! 💼 #legalprecedent #jurisdiction #civilprocedure #jharkhandhighcourt #lawupdates #litigationmatters #justiceforall
1
-
RAW LAW
Gauhati High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance Due to Appellants’ Failure to Establish Continuous Readiness and Willingness Within Stipulated Period Court’s Decision: The Gauhati High Court dismissed the second appeal, upholding the first appellate court’s decision to reverse the trial court’s decree for specific performance. The court found no substantial question of law in favor of the appellants (plaintiffs in the original suit), affirming that they failed to demonstrate their readiness and willingness to fulfill the contractual terms within the stipulated time. Facts: The respondent (seller) entered an agreement with the appellants (buyers) to sell a plot of land with a house for a fixed price. After paying an advance, the appellants were to pay the remaining balance within four months, after which the respondent would execute a sale deed. Although the appellants claimed readiness to pay, they alleged that the respondent delayed executing the deed. Consequently, they filed a suit for specific performance, which the trial court decreed in their favor. The respondent appealed, and the first appellate court reversed the trial court’s decision, leading to this second appeal. Issues: Whether the appellants were ready and willing to perform their part of the contract. Whether time was of the essence in the contract for the sale. Court’s Reasoning: The court found discrepancies in the appellants’ claims of readiness, observing that they had not approached the respondent within the stipulated time and failed to prove they made consistent efforts to complete the purchase. The court noted that the appellants waited over a year after the alleged refusal before initiating legal proceedings, which weakened their claim of continuous readiness. Conclusion: The court concluded that the appellants did not adequately demonstrate their readiness and willingness to fulfill their contractual obligations within the specified period. Consequently, it affirmed the first appellate court’s ruling, denying specific performance. #GauhatiHighCourt #SpecificPerformance #ContractLaw #RealEstateLaw #JudicialDecision #LegalReadiness #CourtRulings #IndianJudiciary #PropertyDispute #LegalObligations
-
Adv seema gul
Case Law 489-F, PPC CASE LAWS ON SECTION 489-F PPC 2005 1. 2007 P cr LJ 1492: S.497 (5) Petition for cancellation of bail. (Bail cancels). Bail granting order proceeded on mere technicalities and was conspicuous for the absence of any mention of respondent’s / accuser’s undertaking. Bail granted by Trial court offence under section 489-F P.P.C. did not attract the prohibitory clause of Sec 497(1) Cr P c ,but mere fact that the Prohibitory clause was not attracted, accused would not ipso facto become entitled to grant of bail. 2. 2007 P cr LJ 1064: S.498 Petition for Pre-arrest bail (confirmed) Offence under section 489-F PPC ,though was non-bailable ,but High Court could not ignore the fact that the offence did not fall within the ambit of Prohibitory clause of Sec 497 Cr PC , and in the absence of exceptional circumstances. 3. 2007 P cr LJ 997: Quashing of F.I.R. (Dismissed). Most important ingredient of offence under section 489-F PPC . being issuance of a Cheque dishonestly, and was bounced by the bank. Plea of the petitioner is that .during the pendency of Civil suit, Criminal proceedings could not be initiated. 4. 2007 P cr LJ 388: 497(5) &498 Cr P C . Cancellation of bail .(Petition Accepted). Petition to the extent of co-accused was dismissed because no role was attributed to the co-accused in the F.I.R. and investigation, Prosecutions whole evidence revolves around the accused who was main culprit. So the petition is accepted to the extent of main accused. 5. 2007 YLR 1264 : S 497 Cr P C. (Admitted Post Arrest Bail) F.I.R. Lodged with delay of four years against accused and co-accused .Complainant alleged in F.I.R that despite payment of amount to accused, no land was got allotted in his favour .and matter was reported to Punchayat accused gave to complainant cheques which were later on dishonored .That complainant himself was involved in case registered under Sec 489-F PPC .Sec 468,470, and 420 PPC had been added later. Pre-arrest bail of co-accused had been confirmed by High Court. Rule of consistency was attracted to the case of accused and admitted post arrest bail.
1
-
Tax Management India
High Court ruled that petitioner can appeal order passed u/s 143(3) r/w sec 144B. Petitioner must file appeal within 15 days for consideration.: The High Court considered the validity of an assessment order u/s 143(3) r/w sec 144B, focusing on the alleged violation of natural justice principles. The petitioner filed a writ petition after 30 days from the order date. The court noted that prior notices were issued u/s 143(2) and 142(1), and the petitioner had responded. Despite knowing the deadline, the petitioner sought an adjournment, extending the response deadline. The petitioner attempted to submit a response after office hours, failing to demonstrate prejudice from the assessing officer's actions. The court found the order appealable and, despite no proven prejudice, granted the petitioner liberty to appeal within 15 days with a condonation request. The appellate authority must hear and decide the appeal within 6 weeks, considering the petitioner's response and grounds. http://dlvr.it/T8Frnw #HighCourt #Legal #NaturalJustice #WritPetition #TaxLaw
-
SCC Online
Delhi High Court quashes FIR in rape, kidnapping & POCSO case following marriage and mutual settlement Reported by Arunima B. Read More Here- https://lnkd.in/e-tzw3Zp #DelhiHighCourt #bharatiyanagriksurakshasanhita #BNSS #FIRQuashing #IPC376 #kidnapping #MarriageSettlement #MutualSettlement #POCSOAct #rapecase #scconline #SCC #legalnews #legalknowledge #scctimes #legalblog #legalupdates #lawstudent #legalresearch #legalstudies #surestwaytolegalresearch #bringingyouthebestlegalnews
10
-
Ruprah Legal Chambers
Exploring the Limits of Judicial Remand SC's Verdict on Section 37 Appeals : : Ruprah Legal Chambers Advocates & Consultants Follow Us : https://lnkd.in/d4MrrPkT https://lnkd.in/dc9U_WTh... : : #section37 #JudicialRemand #LegalUpdate #ArbitrationAct #LawFirmNews #ruprahlegalchambers
-
Netlawgic Legal Services
⚖️𝗕𝗼𝗺𝗯𝗮𝘆 𝗛𝗖 : 𝗡𝗼𝘁 𝗔𝗹𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗥𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗲 𝗮 𝗖𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲🚨 Case: Subhash Rambhau Athare & Anr. vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. Order Date: 23rd September 2024 The Bombay High Court quashed charges under Section 3 of the Official Secrets Act, 1923, in a case involving Subhash Rambhau Athare and Santosh Rambhau Athare. The Court ruled that the police station involved did not qualify as a "prohibited place" under the Act. However, charges under Sections 120-B and 506 of the IPC will proceed in the lower court. This decision highlights the importance of correctly applying legal provisions and protecting individuals from potential misuse of the law, i.e., in the present case. However, recording is not to be constituted as a crime under the Official Secrets Act, it can still attract possibly applicable provisions of other legal statutes and rules. Furthermore, the Bombay HC has set a precedent regarding the ambit of the Official Secrets Act. ⚖️ 📃 Read the official order below 👇 #dataprivacy #privacylaw #evidenceact #legalupdate #bombayhighcourt #criminallaw #courtruling #officialsecretsact #IPC #cyberlaw #cyber #electronic #digitalevidence
5
-
Omnilawyers, Advocates & Solicitors
Arbitration Act, 1940 doesn't empower Arbitrator or Court to award interest upon interest or compound interest: Supreme Court #SupremeCourt #ArbitrationAward #Arbitrator #compoundinterest #contract #interestoninterest #JusticePankajMithal #SimpleInterest #legalnews #legalknowledge #legalblog #legalupdates #lawstudent #legalresearch #legalstudies
-
MD LEGAL LLP
S. 21 CPC | Objections To Place Of Suing Can't Be Allowed Unless Taken In Court Of First Instance At Earliest Opportunity: Supreme Court The Supreme Court held that objections to jurisdiction under Section 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), must be filed at the earliest opportunity. The Court emphasized that objections regarding the place of suing should be raised in the court of first instance and cannot be entertained at a later stage unless injustice is caused. ⚖️ Credits: LiveLaw Read More - https://lnkd.in/dMbE25Rc #SupremeCourt #CPC #Jurisdiction #Law #LegalNews #CourtRuling #India #Judiciary #LegalUpdates #mdlegal #mumbailawfirm #legalnews #advmahavirdeshlahra #mdlegal #mdlegalllp #mumbailawfirm #lawupdates #supremecourt #highcourt
-
Law Connect CS
Law Connect introducing a Comprehensive Test Series for CS Professional Students (Old & New Syllabus) for Dec 2024 Attempt. You can purchase test series for individual subjects according to your needs—there’s no requirement to buy the entire module. *What to Expect?* • Unscheduled Test Series • 5 Unit Test & 2 Full Syllabus Test • Weekly Doubt Sessions • ABC Analysis (70% of topics align with Dec 2023 & June 2024 Exams to ensure relevance.) • Detailed Performance Analysis & Feedback • One to One Call Sessions *Money Back Guarantee* 50% Amount of Test Series returned. If you attempt all the test papers. We want student has to give all the test paper before the exams rather than purchased the test series and not given any test papers. *For Inquiry and Enrolment:* What’sapp at 9084610707 or mail us on info@lawconnect.co.in #cs #cstestseries #csaspirant #csprofessionaltestseries #icsi #lawconnectcs
-
Current Tax Online
📢 Case Update: SATISH CHAND JAIN vs. ACIT & ANR. 📅 High Court of Delhi 🗓️ Date of Decision: 11th September 2024 The Delhi High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, declaring the second notice under section 148 invalid after the first reassessment proceedings had been finalized. The court followed the precedent set in Anindita Sengupta vs. Asstt. CIT & Ors. (2024 SCC Online Del 2296), reinforcing the importance of adhering to procedural safeguards in reassessment. For a detailed case summary, visit currenttaxonline.com #TaxLaw #Reassessment #IncomeTax #Section148 #LegalUpdate #CurrentTaxOnline
-
LawStreet Journal
Mere arbitration clause in invoices invalid without express or implicit acceptance: Delhi HC [Read Order] . . Follow Lawstreet Journal for more legal updates #DelhiHighCourt #ArbitrationClause #LegalRuling #ContractLaw #ArbitrationMandate #UnilateralAppointment #InvoiceDispute #LegalUpdate #CommercialLaw #JudicialDecision . . Click to read full article 👇 https://lnkd.in/dfm9SnU7
-
The Legal Affair
The Jharkhand High Court clarified that under Order 23 Rule 2 CPC, the limitation for a fresh suit applies as if the first suit had never been filed. This ensures fairness for plaintiffs addressing formal defects while safeguarding the law of limitation. In this case, the Court allowed withdrawal with liberty to file afresh, emphasizing the importance of procedural justice. #jharkhandhighcourt #civilprocedurecode #order23rule2 #lawoflimitation #legalupdate #justiceprevails #litigationmatters #fairtrial #legalclarity #law
1
-
IBC Laws
Arbitration: Applicability of section 36(2) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to Execution Proceeding initiated under section 36(1) and power of Executing as well as Appellate Court to stay the Execution Proceeding during pendency of an Appeal preferred under Section 37 – Orissa High Court Case Citation: (2024) ibclaw.in 656 HC https://lnkd.in/gaT2n6qi
3
-
RAW LAW
High Court of Sikkim Reaffirms Separability Doctrine: “Even if the Primary Agreement is Rendered Void or Terminated, the Arbitration Clause Remains Valid” Under Arbitration Act, 1996 Court’s Decision: The High Court of Sikkim overturned the decision of the District Judge, who had invalidated the arbitral award based on the invalidation of the underlying contract. The court clarified that under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, an arbitration clause is separable from the main contract. Even if the primary contract is rendered void or terminated, the arbitration clause can still stand independently and facilitate dispute resolution. Facts of the Case: Agreement for Lottery Operations: On August 24, 2001, the State of Sikkim entered into an agreement with a private entity appointing it as the sole marketing agent for an online computerized lottery system. The agreement was for seven years, with a minimum assured revenue clause. The agreement included an arbitration clause for resolving disputes. Legal Challenge to the Agreement: The legality of the tender process and the agreement itself were challenged in writ petitions before the High Court of Sikkim. In 2003, the High Court quashed the tender process and the agreement. However, it allowed the private entity to continue operations temporarily under specific conditions while the State sought fresh tenders. Dispute Arises: Post-agreement nullification, disputes surfaced over payments and performance. The private entity sought arbitration under the original agreement. The arbitrator awarded ₹96.48 crores to the State of Sikkim, but this award was challenged under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act before the District Judge. Issues: Can an arbitration clause survive when the main agreement has been declared invalid or quashed? Did the District Judge err in invalidating the arbitration award on the grounds that the arbitration clause perished with the agreement? Court’s Reasoning: The District Judge’s ruling was flawed as it failed to consider the evolution of arbitration law under the 1996 Act. The court underscored that the arbitration clause does not automatically perish with the main contract. Instead, it survives to facilitate dispute resolution. The separability doctrine ensures the independence of the arbitration agreement, allowing disputes to be resolved despite the invalidity or termination of the main agreement. Conclusion: The High Court of Sikkim quashed the District Judge’s ruling and reinstated the validity of the arbitration clause and the resulting arbitral award. It affirmed that arbitration clauses under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, are separable and enforceable, regardless of the status of the main contract. #HighCourtOfSikkim #ArbitrationLaw #SeparabilityDoctrine #ArbitrationAndConciliationAct #LegalUpdates #ContractLaw
Explore collaborative articles
We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.
Explore MoreOthers named Aman Mishra in India
-
Aman Mishra
Senior Data Engineer | Atlas Copco Group | Microsoft Certified | Data Transformation and Analytics | Fabric | GenAI
Lucknow -
Aman Mishra
Kearney | IIT Bombay
Mumbai -
Aman Mishra
Content Creator at YouTube(We Won Academy) | 200k+ Subscribers | 50 Million Views | IISER Bhopal
Bhopal -
Aman Mishra
AI | DS | ML | LLM | Certified Scrum Master (CSM) | ASM | Snowflake | Data Analytics | Business Consultant | Lead BA
Noida -
Aman Mishra
Bengaluru
4158 others named Aman Mishra in India are on LinkedIn
See others named Aman Mishra